InflueAnswers
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Shifra
  • Projects
  • Publications
  • Insights
  • Contact Us
Reach us
InflueAnswers
InflueAnswers

Lebanon: A Decade of Darkness

Satellite evidence of economic collapse, war, and displacement. Six datasets. One country losing its light.

NASA VIIRS Black Marble · Google Earth Engine · ACLED · IOM DTM · UN-Habitat · NASA FIRMS

01
Nighttime Lights 2016-2026
26 Lebanese districts tracked from space. Watch the country dim year by year. Toggle between governorate and district level.
NASA VIIRSMonthly26 districts
→
02
What Caused the Darkness?
Two kinds of darkness: a nationwide economic collapse (2019-2022), then war darkness concentrated in the southern border districts (2024, and again in 2026). The two patterns differ in timing and geography.
AttributionAll 26 districts
→
03
The War in the South
Four corroborating datasets - ACLED conflict records, IOM displacement tracking, UN-Habitat building destruction maps, and NASA thermal anomalies - align with what the satellite saw from October 2023.
ACLEDIOM DTMNASA FIRMSUN-Habitat
→
04
The Economic Scale of Destruction
$6.8 billion in physical damage. $11 billion in reconstruction needs. Nabatiyeh and South governorates account for 70% of all physical destruction. World Bank RDNA, March 2025.
World Bank RDNA$11B needs9 governorates
→
05
Lebanon vs the Region
Is Lebanon unique? Compare with Syria, Jordan, Cyprus, and Israel/OPT on an interactive regional map. Only Lebanon shows a collapse on this scale; neighbours' dips - Syria by 2022, Gaza in 2024 - are smaller and shorter.
5 countriesRegional map
→
Sources: NASA VIIRS VNP46A2 · ACLED · IOM DTM · UN-Habitat/UoB/CREEMO · NASA FIRMS · FAO GAUL InflueAnswers S.A.L - Beirut, Lebanon  ·  influeanswers.com
01
Nighttime Lights (NTL) - What the Satellite Sees
NASA measures light emitted at night from space. Brighter = more electricity, more activity. We tracked all 26 Lebanese districts from 2016 to September 2026. The dimming you see is not a power cut - it is a civilisational collapse recorded in light.
Geographic level
Time axis
View
Year range
From 2016
To 2025
Districts All · None
Key events
Overlay
Oct 2023 onwards only
What the satellite is actually measuring:
Every light visible from space at night - a shop still open, an office running late, a factory in operation, a restaurant full of people, a generator keeping a family warm - is economic activity. The satellite doesn't measure money. It measures consequence: the light that economic life produces as a side effect. When that life contracts, the light dims.

What this chart shows:
Each coloured line is a Lebanese governorate. The pink line dominating the top is Beirut and Mount Lebanon - the economic centre of the country. Watch what happens from 2019: the lines don't just dip, they fall and stay down. The 2019 financial collapse, the 2020 Beirut explosion, and the 2021 fuel crisis stack on top of each other. By 2022, most of Lebanon is emitting one-third of the light it produced three years earlier. The recovery from 2023 onwards is real but partial - the informal dollarised economy brought some lights back on, but the country never returned to its 2019 level.

Why economists use nighttime light as a proxy for GDP:
In a normal country, you measure economic output through official statistics - tax records, trade data, bank transactions. Lebanon's official data became unreliable after 2019: multiple exchange rates, a collapsed banking system, and a largely informal cash economy made the numbers meaningless. Nighttime light gives researchers an independent signal that cannot be manipulated, does not depend on a government reporting accurately, and updates monthly. The World Bank, the IMF, and academic economists routinely use NTL to estimate economic activity in conflict zones and countries with broken statistical systems. For Lebanon, it may be the most honest economic indicator available.

The one thing this chart cannot show:
NTL measures aggregate brightness - it cannot distinguish between a dark neighbourhood because people are poor versus dark because people left. That is why we cross-reference with the IOM displacement data: the combination of the two tells you not just that an area went dark, but why.
District-by-district data
All 26 Lebanese districts: peak radiance, lowest point, % lost, and recovery by 2025. Click any column header to sort.
District ↕ Peak radiance ↓ Lowest point ↕ % lost ↕ 2025 level ↕ % recovered ↕
District Map - Where Did the Lights Go?
Each district is coloured by the average nighttime radiance that year. Click any year below the map to see how the darkness spread. Yellow = bright. Dark red = almost no light. In 2024 the southern districts drop to between 38% and 70% of their 2019 light.
District ranking for year: 2022
Drag to change year
02
What Caused the Darkness? - A Nationwide Collapse, Then Local War Darkness
Lebanon's lights went out in two different ways. The first was the economic collapse - every one of the 26 districts lost light between 2019 and 2022 as the state grid failed, from 29% (Jezzine) to 78%, with most losing 50-80%. The second was local: the war that began in October 2023 darkened the southern border districts - Nabatieh governorate lost 13% of its light in 2024 while the rest of the country outside the South, Nabatieh and the Bekaa brightened by a quarter - with the sharpest drop in October-November 2024, and the south dimmed again after the March 2026 escalation. Heavy conflict activity also hit Baalbek. The two dimming patterns differ in timing and geography.
Each district: orange = light lost to the economic collapse (NTL, 2019-2022). Red = conflict events recorded during the war period (ACLED, Oct 2023-Dec 2024).
The south bears the heaviest conflict load. Baalbek also shows significant activity - targeted by Israeli airstrikes in September-October 2024 - despite being outside the southern front. Hover over any bar for exact numbers. Orange uses the bottom axis (% of 2019 NTL peak). Red uses the top axis (event count).
How to read this chart:

Every Lebanese district gets two bars.

The orange bar shows how much light the district lost between 2019 and 2022 - that is the economic collapse. When Lebanon's financial system failed, the state electricity grid shut down, businesses closed, and families could no longer afford generators. Every one of the 26 districts lost light - most between 50 and 80 percent, with the smallest losses in Jezzine (29%), Tyre (47%) and Hermel (48%). That is the point: the economic collapse hit every district, unlike the war, which concentrated in the south and Baalbek.

The red bar shows conflict events recorded by ACLED during the war period (October 2023 to December 2024). This is where the chart becomes a diagnostic tool: red bars only appear where fighting actually happened. The southern front - Tyre, Marjeyoun, Bint Jbeil, Hasbaya, Nabatieh - carries large red bars. Baalbek also has a significant red bar from Israeli strikes in late 2024. The rest of Lebanon has no red bar. Zero.

What this proves:
The orange bars tell you about the economic crisis. The red bars tell you about the war. Two different catastrophes, measurable separately from space - and the satellite can show you exactly which districts suffered from which cause.

A district like Bsharri has a large orange bar (hit hard by the economic collapse) and almost no red bar (the war did not reach it). Marjeyoun has both: already damaged by the economic collapse, then hit again by the war.

Note on the two axes: orange bars measure a percentage of light lost (bottom axis). Red bars measure a count of conflict events (top axis). They use different scales because they measure different things.
03
The War in the South - Four Independent Datasets
We cross-reference the satellite light data with four corroborating sources: conflict event records (ACLED), population displacement counts (IOM), building destruction maps (UN-Habitat), and NASA thermal anomalies. All four are consistent with the satellite record.
① Lights fade as the war begins - southern Lebanon nighttime radiance
Average satellite-measured light across Tyre, Nabatieh, Bint Jbeil, Marjeyoun, Hasbaya, Saida, and Jezzine. The line drops sharply from October 2023, partially recovers after the ceasefire (November 2024) - in 2025 it even rose above its pre-war level of early 2023 (61% vs 53% of 2019), but never back to 2019. After the March 2026 escalation it dims again, from 68% of the 2019 level in March to 58% in June 2026 - a renewed drop, though shallower than the November 2024 low (37%).
② Conflict events and fatalities - ACLED data
Monthly count of political violence events in southern Lebanon - battles, explosions and remote violence such as air and drone strikes and shelling, and violence against civilians (ACLED). Fatalities shown as dotted line. Near-zero from 2016 to 2023, then a massive surge from October 2023, and again from March 2026. Data through September 2026.
Most recent months are preliminary and subject to revision (ACLED).
③ Population displacement - IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix
Total IDPs recorded in Lebanon. 2024 peak: 899,725 IDPs on 24 November 2024 (IOM DTM Round 65). District reporting continued to 31 October 2025 (Round 88): 64,417 IDPs, led by Nabatieh (19,525) and Tyre (Sour) (18,802). After the March 2026 escalation, IOM resumed national snapshots from 17 June 2026 (844,243 IDPs); as of 29 September 2026 (Round 118), 329,686 IDPs remain displaced. After the escalation, displacement peaked at over one million (Ground Truth Solutions, July 2026); IOM published no snapshot for that period, so the peak is not plotted.
Monthly values use the last IOM round of each month, summed across districts. IOM publishes 2026 figures at national level only, so district filters stop at October 2025. Data subject to revision by IOM.
④ Population returns - IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix, Round 86 (May 2025, not updated)
Districts where displaced persons have returned as of May 2025. 970,470 individuals recorded as returned to home districts across 13 qadaas (IOM DTM Round 86, May 2, 2025).
District returns are not published for later rounds. For the 2026 displacement, IOM reports 877,203 IDPs returned nationally as of 29 September 2026 (Round 118) - a separate cohort, not comparable with the 2025 figure above. Note: IOM methodology for "returned" is under clarification - figures may include returns to destroyed or partially habitable areas. Data pending further confirmation from IOM DTM Lebanon.
Buildings destroyed by district - UN-Habitat satellite analysis, Dec 2024
Source: UN-Habitat / University of Balamand / CREEMO. Bars show % of pre-conflict buildings that were totally or partially destroyed. Marjeyoun is shown at 31.9% (7,577 of 23,759): the report prints 27.6%, but its own district counts and totals (18,507 of 237,425 buildings) only reconcile at 31.9%. Why is Beirut not here? This assessment covered only the South and Nabatiyeh governorates - the conflict zone. Beirut's buildings were not assessed because it was not part of the ground war.

Important caveat - data as of December 2024 only: Since March 2026, a new wave of conflict has fundamentally changed this picture. UNDP's updated satellite assessment (South Lebanon issue no. 2, July 2026; imagery 23 October 2025 to 16 June 2026) found 24,068 buildings destroyed, 7,191 partially damaged and 21,025 with minor damage - 31.2% of the 167,460 buildings assessed - and about US$3.05 billion in building damage. Nabatieh governorate holds 85% of the destroyed buildings. In the worst-hit towns nearly the whole building stock is damaged: Kfar Kila (92.7%), Aitaroun (91.4%), Aayta Ech-Chaab (89.6%), Blida (87.1%), Bint Jbeil (77.6%). Destruction more than doubled after UNDP's first assessment (11,095 destroyed by 29 April 2026). These figures cover the 2026 war only - buildings already damaged in 2024 were excluded - and use a different method, so they are not added to the December 2024 bars above.
NASA thermal anomaly record - southern Lebanon (2000-2026)
How NASA collects this data: NASA FIRMS (Fire Information for Resource Management System) uses MODIS sensors aboard the Terra and Aqua satellites to detect thermal anomalies - any ground-level heat source significantly above background temperature. It captures wildfires, agricultural burning, forest fires, industrial heat, and military bombardment (explosions, strikes, fires from shelling). The satellite cannot distinguish between heat sources from the signal alone: interpretation requires cross-referencing with conflict records, fire weather data, and ground reports.

What the peaks show: The recurring August-October spikes every year are Lebanon's wildfire and agricultural burning season - not conflict. This is a consistent background pattern visible across all years. The peaks worth noting above that baseline are: the 2006 Lebanon War (July-August 2006, unusually early in the season and far above typical fire levels); the June-July 2007 early-season anomaly, likely linked to post-2006 war vegetation damage and unexploded ordnance in the south; October 2016, one of Lebanon's worst documented wildfire seasons; the October 2020 wildfires, a catastrophic fire event that struck weeks after the Beirut port explosion when firefighting capacity was depleted; November 2021, another severe fire season; and the 2024 Israeli military campaign, which produced the largest thermal anomaly signature in the satellite record through September 2026 - by a wide margin, and distinguishable from fire season by both its extreme magnitude and its coincidence with verified military operations.

Note: This dataset covers November 2000 to September 2026. The sensor detects large fires, not individual strikes, so winter and spring months often read zero even during active bombardment - as in November 2023 and March 2026, when ACLED recorded heavy fighting. Use this record for fire-scale signatures, not as a count of strikes.
Use the zoom tool (top right of chart) to explore specific periods.
04
The Economic Scale of Destruction
The satellite data translates into dollars. The World Bank's Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA, March 2025), conducted at the request of the Lebanese government using SAR imagery and field verification, estimates $6.8 billion in physical damage, $7.2 billion in economic losses, and $11 billion in reconstruction needs from the 2023-2024 conflict. Nabatiyeh and South governorates account for 70% of all physical damage.
Source: World Bank / CNRS-L, Lebanon RDNA, March 2025. Data covers Oct 8 2023 - Dec 20 2024. Methodology uses SAR + high-resolution satellite imagery + field teams + ACLED incident cross-reference.
$6.8B
Physical damage
Buildings, roads, infrastructure
$7.2B
Economic losses
Lost output, tourism, commerce
$11B
Reconstruction needs
Recovery and reconstruction
67%
Housing share of damage
$4.6B in homes destroyed
What these numbers mean:

These are not estimates of rebuilding cost alone - they are the full economic toll of the 2023-2024 conflict.

Physical damage ($6.8B) is what was destroyed: homes, hospitals, schools, roads, factories, farms. Two-thirds of it is residential housing - meaning the primary impact fell on families, not infrastructure.

Economic losses ($7.2B) are what the country stopped earning because of the conflict: tourism that did not arrive, businesses that closed, factories that stopped running, farmers who could not harvest. These losses continue to accumulate even after the fighting stops.

Reconstruction needs ($11B) is what it would cost to rebuild. The World Bank notes that by the end of 2024 Lebanon's real GDP had fallen by close to 40% since 2019, so these needs fall on a much smaller economy.

What is not included: This assessment covers October 8, 2023 to December 20, 2024 only. The new wave of conflict that began March 2, 2026 - which displaced over one million people and caused significant new destruction in Nabatiyeh and Bint Jbeil - is not reflected in these figures. A new RDNA will be needed to capture the full cost.
Physical damage by governorate (US$ millions) - World Bank RDNA, Oct 2023-Dec 2024
Nabatiyeh and South bear 70% of all physical destruction. Baalbek-Hermel and the Bekaa also suffered significant damage from Israeli strikes.
Damage, losses and reconstruction needs by sector - World Bank RDNA, Oct 2023-Dec 2024
Housing accounts for 67% of all physical damage and 57% of all reconstruction needs ($6.3B). Commerce and tourism losses ($3.4B) reflect the nationwide economic paralysis.
Lebanese port activity - vessel calls and imports (IMF PortWatch, 2019-2026)
Satellite-tracked vessel arrivals (AIS signals) at Lebanon's 5 main ports. A third independent corroborating signal alongside nighttime light and the World Bank assessment - ships cannot be bribed.
Source: IMF PortWatch / OCHA, via HDX. Data through September 2026. Note: data starts January 2019; pre-2019 history available on request from portwatch@imf.org.
What this chart shows:

The pre-collapse baseline (2019): Beirut port averaged 153 vessel arrivals per month before the financial crisis. It is by far Lebanon's dominant port, handling the majority of the country's maritime imports.

The August 2020 explosion: Vessel calls to Beirut dropped 34% in a single month - from 125 in July to 83 in August 2020. This is the sharpest single-month shock in the record and is visible immediately on the red line. The port's grain silos and warehouse infrastructure were destroyed, and it took years to partially restore capacity.

The economic collapse (2019-2022): Beirut's monthly average fell from 153 in 2019 to 92 in 2022 - a 40% decline. Beirut's import volumes collapsed by 44%: from 8.5 million metric tons in 2019 to 4.7 million in 2022 (across all five ports, 37%: 12.4 to 7.8 million). This is not a port problem - it is a country that could no longer afford to import. The satellite light data tells the same story from a different angle.

The fuel crisis (2021): Tanker calls - the vessels that bring fuel - dropped sharply in 2021 as the state could not finance fuel imports. This is visible as a dip in Beirut's line specifically during the period when EDL electricity collapsed to near zero.

Tripoli's unusual rise: While Beirut declined, Tripoli (blue line) actually increased - from 34 vessel calls/month in 2019 to 50 in 2022. This reflects trade diversion: as Beirut's damaged port struggled, some cargo was rerouted north. It is not a sign of northern economic strength; it is a consequence of Beirut's damage.

The war period (2023-2024): Saida port (orange line), located in the southern conflict zone, saw vessel calls drop from an average of 21/month before October 2023 to 14/month during the war (October 2023-December 2024) - a 34% decline. The southern ports (Saida and Tyre) serve the same hinterland as the districts most affected by the conflict.

Exports: the collapse was even sharper than imports. Beirut's export volumes fell 66% between 2019 and 2021 - from 1.75 million metric tons to 597,000. Beirut's export tonnage as a share of its import tonnage dropped from 21% to 11%, meaning Lebanon became even more dependent on imports precisely as it could no longer afford them. This is a structural feature of the collapse: the country's ability to earn foreign exchange through exports deteriorated faster than its consumption of foreign goods.

The Tripoli export anomaly. While the rest of Lebanon collapsed, Tripoli's exports grew by a factor of 5 - from 219,000 metric tons in 2019 to 1.26 million in 2023. This is one of the most striking signals in the entire dataset and has no clear explanation from Lebanon's domestic economy alone. Possible causes include Syrian goods being re-exported through Tripoli following changes in regional trade routes, construction and raw materials moving towards northern Syria, or activity related to Syria's post-Assad political transition. This finding is flagged here as an open question requiring investigation - it may represent legitimate trade growth or something more opaque. It warrants a dedicated inquiry.
Beirut: imports vs exports (metric tons)
Lebanon's extreme import dependency - and how the collapse made it worse. Exports fell 66% from 2019 to 2021.
Tripoli export surge (2021-2023) - an open question
Tripoli exports grew 5x from 2019 to 2023 while the rest of Lebanon collapsed. Cause unconfirmed - possible Syrian re-export, construction trade, or post-Assad transition activity.
05
Comparing Lebanon with Neighbouring Countries
One of the most important findings: Lebanon's collapse is not a regional phenomenon. Syria, Jordan, Cyprus and Israel/OPT did not experience anything similar. This is not consistent with satellite calibration errors, regional weather patterns, or shared regional economic trends, since those would affect neighbouring countries too. Lebanon's darkness is specific to Lebanon - and to the south.
Nighttime light over time - Lebanon vs. the region (2016-2026)
All countries indexed so that 2019 = 100%. Each country's value is the simple average of its districts, each counting equally regardless of size or population; Israel/OPT averages Israel's districts together with the West Bank and Gaza units. Lebanon (red) collapses. The others dip at most briefly - Syria by 2022, Israel/OPT in 2024 as Gaza went dark - and end above their 2019 level.
How to read this chart

Think of it as a brightness meter for each country. In 2019, every country is set to 100 - that is the starting point. Everything above 100 means the country got brighter (more activity, more electricity, more economic life). Everything below 100 means it got darker.

The red line is Lebanon. Watch what happens from 2019 onwards: it falls off a cliff. By 2022, Lebanon is at roughly 30 - it lost two-thirds of its nighttime light compared to 2019. That is not a power cut. That is a country shutting down.

Now look at everyone else. Jordan and Cyprus hold steady or grow - Jordan reaches 148 by 2025. Israel/OPT (Israel, the West Bank and Gaza combined) grows too, but dips from 123 in 2023 to 110 in 2024 as Gaza went dark during the war. Syria dips to 71 by 2022 and then recovers. If the darkness was caused by a regional problem - bad weather, satellite errors, a shared economic shock - all five lines would dip together. They do not. Only Lebanon falls to roughly a third of its 2019 light. Lebanon's collapse is specific to Lebanon.

Note on Syria (orange): Syria's fluctuations reflect its own civil war, which started in 2011 and destroyed infrastructure years before this chart begins. The two collapses have completely different causes, timelines, and geographies. Even a country with its own catastrophic war does not show the same sharp 2019 collapse that Lebanon does.
Regional satellite map - click a year to compare
All countries on the same colour scale. Yellow = high radiance. Dark red = low radiance. Hover over any country for exact values. Israel/OPT includes West Bank and Gaza boundaries (geoBoundaries / geoboundaries.org).
Sources: NASA VIIRS VNP46A2 · ACLED (HDX) · IOM DTM Lebanon (HDX API, Rounds 1-114; Mobility Snapshots Rounds 117-118, Sep 2026) & Round 86 returnees (May 2025) · Ground Truth Solutions (Jul 2026) · UN-Habitat/UoB/CREEMO Building Destruction Assessment (Jan 2025) · NASA FIRMS · World Bank/CNRS-L RDNA (Mar 2025) · UNDP Building-Level Damage Assessment, South Lebanon (Jul 2026) · IMF PortWatch · FAO GAUL admin-2 · geoBoundaries (PSE) InflueAnswers S.A.L - Beirut, Lebanon  ·  influeanswers.com
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Team Login

InflueAnswers S.A.L ©

Based in Beirut, Lebanon